Conductors contain free charges that move easily. When excess charge is placed on a conductor or the conductor is put into a static electric field, charges in the conductor quickly respond to reach a steady state called electrostatic equilibrium.
[link] shows the effect of an electric field on free charges in a conductor. The free charges move until the field is perpendicular to the conductor’s surface. There can be no component of the field parallel to the surface in electrostatic equilibrium, since, if there were, it would produce further movement of charge. A positive free charge is shown, but free charges can be either positive or negative and are, in fact, negative in metals. The motion of a positive charge is equivalent to the motion of a negative charge in the opposite direction.
A conductor placed in an electric field will be polarized. [link] shows the result of placing a neutral conductor in an originally uniform electric field. The field becomes stronger near the conductor but entirely disappears inside it.
Excess charges placed on a spherical conductor repel and move until they are evenly distributed, as shown in [link]. Excess charge is forced to the surface until the field inside the conductor is zero. Outside the conductor, the field is exactly the same as if the conductor were replaced by a point charge at its center equal to the excess charge.
The properties of a conductor are consistent with the situations already discussed and can be used to analyze any conductor in electrostatic equilibrium. This can lead to some interesting new insights, such as described below.
How can a very uniform electric field be created? Consider a system of two metal plates with opposite charges on them, as shown in [link]. The properties of conductors in electrostatic equilibrium indicate that the electric field between the plates will be uniform in strength and direction. Except near the edges, the excess charges distribute themselves uniformly, producing field lines that are uniformly spaced (hence uniform in strength) and perpendicular to the surfaces (hence uniform in direction, since the plates are flat). The edge effects are less important when the plates are close together.
A near uniform electric field of approximately 150 N/C, directed downward, surrounds Earth, with the magnitude increasing slightly as we get closer to the surface. What causes the electric field? At around 100 km above the surface of Earth we have a layer of charged particles, called the ionosphere. The ionosphere is responsible for a range of phenomena including the electric field surrounding Earth. In fair weather the ionosphere is positive and the Earth largely negative, maintaining the electric field ([link](a)).
In storm conditions clouds form and localized electric fields can be larger and reversed in direction ([link](b)). The exact charge distributions depend on the local conditions, and variations of [link](b) are possible.
If the electric field is sufficiently large, the insulating properties of the surrounding material break down and it becomes conducting. For air this occurs at around
N/C. Air ionizes ions and electrons recombine, and we get discharge in the form of lightning sparks and corona discharge.
So far we have considered excess charges on a smooth, symmetrical conductor surface. What happens if a conductor has sharp corners or is pointed? Excess charges on a nonuniform conductor become concentrated at the sharpest points. Additionally, excess charge may move on or off the conductor at the sharpest points.
To see how and why this happens, consider the charged conductor in [link]. The electrostatic repulsion of like charges is most effective in moving them apart on the flattest surface, and so they become least concentrated there. This is because the forces between identical pairs of charges at either end of the conductor are identical, but the components of the forces parallel to the surfaces are different. The component parallel to the surface is greatest on the flattest surface and, hence, more effective in moving the charge.
The same effect is produced on a conductor by an externally applied electric field, as seen in [link] (c). Since the field lines must be perpendicular to the surface, more of them are concentrated on the most curved parts.
On a very sharply curved surface, such as shown in [link], the charges are so concentrated at the point that the resulting electric field can be great enough to remove them from the surface. This can be useful.
Lightning rods work best when they are most pointed. The large charges created in storm clouds induce an opposite charge on a building that can result in a lightning bolt hitting the building. The induced charge is bled away continually by a lightning rod, preventing the more dramatic lightning strike.
Of course, we sometimes wish to prevent the transfer of charge rather than to facilitate it. In that case, the conductor should be very smooth and have as large a radius of curvature as possible. (See [link].) Smooth surfaces are used on high-voltage transmission lines, for example, to avoid leakage of charge into the air.
Another device that makes use of some of these principles is a Faraday cage. This is a metal shield that encloses a volume. All electrical charges will reside on the outside surface of this shield, and there will be no electrical field inside. A Faraday cage is used to prohibit stray electrical fields in the environment from interfering with sensitive measurements, such as the electrical signals inside a nerve cell.
During electrical storms if you are driving a car, it is best to stay inside the car as its metal body acts as a Faraday cage with zero electrical field inside. If in the vicinity of a lightning strike, its effect is felt on the outside of the car and the inside is unaffected, provided you remain totally inside. This is also true if an active (“hot”) electrical wire was broken (in a storm or an accident) and fell on your car.
Is the object in [link] a conductor or an insulator? Justify your answer.
{:}
If the electric field lines in the figure above were perpendicular to the object, would it necessarily be a conductor? Explain.
The discussion of the electric field between two parallel conducting plates, in this module states that edge effects are less important if the plates are close together. What does close mean? That is, is the actual plate separation crucial, or is the ratio of plate separation to plate area crucial?
Would the self-created electric field at the end of a pointed conductor, such as a lightning rod, remove positive or negative charge from the conductor? Would the same sign charge be removed from a neutral pointed conductor by the application of a similar externally created electric field? (The answers to both questions have implications for charge transfer utilizing points.)
Why is a golfer with a metal club over her shoulder vulnerable to lightning in an open fairway? Would she be any safer under a tree?
Can the belt of a Van de Graaff accelerator be a conductor? Explain.
Are you relatively safe from lightning inside an automobile? Give two reasons.
Discuss pros and cons of a lightning rod being grounded versus simply being attached to a building.
Using the symmetry of the arrangement, show that the net Coulomb force on the charge *
(a) Using the symmetry of the arrangement, show that the electric field at the center of the square in [link] is zero if the charges on the four corners are exactly equal. (b) Show that this is also true for any combination of charges in which
and
(a) What is the direction of the total Coulomb force on
in [link] if
is negative,
and both are negative, and
and both are positive? (b) What is the direction of the electric field at the center of the square in this situation?
Considering [link], suppose that
and
. First show that *
is in static equilibrium. (You may neglect the gravitational force.) Then discuss whether the equilibrium is stable or unstable, noting that this may depend on the signs of the charges and the direction of displacement of *
from the center of the square.
In regions of low humidity, one develops a special “grip” when opening car doors, or touching metal door knobs. This involves placing as much of the hand on the device as possible, not just the ends of one’s fingers. Discuss the induced charge and explain why this is done.
Tollbooth stations on roadways and bridges usually have a piece of wire stuck in the pavement before them that will touch a car as it approaches. Why is this done?
Suppose a woman carries an excess charge. To maintain her charged status can she be standing on ground wearing just any pair of shoes? How would you discharge her? What are the consequences if she simply walks away?
Sketch the electric field lines in the vicinity of the conductor in [link] given the field was originally uniform and parallel to the object’s long axis. Is the resulting field small near the long side of the object?
{:}
Sketch the electric field lines in the vicinity of the conductor in [link] given the field was originally uniform and parallel to the object’s long axis. Is the resulting field small near the long side of the object?
{:}
Sketch the electric field between the two conducting plates shown in [link], given the top plate is positive and an equal amount of negative charge is on the bottom plate. Be certain to indicate the distribution of charge on the plates.
{:}
Sketch the electric field lines in the vicinity of the charged insulator in [link] noting its nonuniform charge distribution.
(a) Find the total electric field at
in [link](b) given that
. (b) Find the total electric field at
in [link](b). (c) If the charges are allowed to move and eventually be brought to rest by friction, what will the final charge configuration be? (That is, will there be a single charge, double charge, etc., and what will its value(s) be?)
(a)
(b)
(c) one charge of
(a) Find the electric field at
in [link](a), given that
. (b) At what position between 3.00 and 8.00 cm is the total electric field the same as that for
alone? (c) Can the electric field be zero anywhere between 0.00 and 8.00 cm? (d) At very large positive or negative values of x, the electric field approaches zero in both (a) and (b). In which does it most rapidly approach zero and why? (e) At what position to the right of 11.0 cm is the total electric field zero, other than at infinity? (Hint: A graphing calculator can yield considerable insight in this problem.)
(a) Find the total Coulomb force on a charge of 2.00 nC located at
in [link] (b), given that
. (b) Find the x-position at which the electric field is zero in [link] (b).
(a) 0.252 N to the left
(b)
Using the symmetry of the arrangement, determine the direction of the force on
in the figure below, given that
and
. (b) Calculate the magnitude of the force on the charge *
*, given that the square is 10.0 cm on a side and
.
(a) Using the symmetry of the arrangement, determine the direction of the electric field at the center of the square in [link], given that
and
. (b) Calculate the magnitude of the electric field at the location of
, given that the square is 5.00 cm on a side.
(a)The electric field at the center of the square will be straight up, since
and
are positive and
and
are negative and all have the same magnitude.
(b)
Find the electric field at the location of
in [link] given that
,
, and the square is 20.0 cm on a side.
Find the total Coulomb force on the charge
in [link], given that
,
,
,
, and
. The square is 50.0 cm on a side.
in the
direction
(a) Find the electric field at the location of
in [link], given that
and
. (b) What is the force on
, given that
?
(a) Find the electric field at the center of the triangular configuration of charges in [link], given that
,
, and
. (b) Is there any combination of charges, other than
, that will produce a zero strength electric field at the center of the triangular configuration?
(a)
, below the horizontal.
(b) No
You can also download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/031da8d3-b525-429c-80cf-6c8ed997733a@11.1
Attribution: