In the previous section, we evaluated limits by looking at graphs or by constructing a table of values. In this section, we establish laws for calculating limits and learn how to apply these laws. In the Student Project at the end of this section, you have the opportunity to apply these limit laws to derive the formula for the area of a circle by adapting a method devised by the Greek mathematician Archimedes. We begin by restating two useful limit results from the previous section. These two results, together with the limit laws, serve as a foundation for calculating many limits.
The first two limit laws were stated in [link] and we repeat them here. These basic results, together with the other limit laws, allow us to evaluate limits of many algebraic functions.
For any real number a and any constant c,
We now take a look at the limit laws, the individual properties of limits. The proofs that these laws hold are omitted here.
Let
and
be defined for all
over some open interval containing a. Assume that L and M are real numbers such that
and
Let c be a constant. Then, each of the following statements holds:
Sum law for limits:
Difference law for limits:
Constant multiple law for limits:
Product law for limits:
Quotient law for limits:
for
Power law for limits:
for every positive integer n.
Root law for limits:
for all L if n is odd and for
if n is even.
We now practice applying these limit laws to evaluate a limit.
Use the limit laws to evaluate
Let’s apply the limit laws one step at a time to be sure we understand how they work. We need to keep in mind the requirement that, at each application of a limit law, the new limits must exist for the limit law to be applied.
Use the limit laws to evaluate
To find this limit, we need to apply the limit laws several times. Again, we need to keep in mind that as we rewrite the limit in terms of other limits, each new limit must exist for the limit law to be applied.
Use the limit laws to evaluate
In each step, indicate the limit law applied.
Begin by applying the product law.
By now you have probably noticed that, in each of the previous examples, it has been the case that
This is not always true, but it does hold for all polynomials for any choice of a and for all rational functions at all values of a for which the rational function is defined.
Let
and
be polynomial functions. Let a be a real number. Then,
To see that this theorem holds, consider the polynomial
By applying the sum, constant multiple, and power laws, we end up with
It now follows from the quotient law that if
and
are polynomials for which
then
[link] applies this result.
Evaluate the
Since 3 is in the domain of the rational function
we can calculate the limit by substituting 3 for x into the function. Thus,
As we have seen, we may evaluate easily the limits of polynomials and limits of some (but not all) rational functions by direct substitution. However, as we saw in the introductory section on limits, it is certainly possible for
to exist when
is undefined. The following observation allows us to evaluate many limits of this type:
If for all
over some open interval containing a, then
To understand this idea better, consider the limit
The function
and the function
are identical for all values of
The graphs of these two functions are shown in [link].
We see that
The limit has the form
where
and
(In this case, we say that
has the indeterminate form
The following Problem-Solving Strategy provides a general outline for evaluating limits of this type.
for all
over some interval containing a. To do this, we may need to try one or more of the following steps:
and
are polynomials, we should factor each function and cancel out any common factors.
is a complex fraction, we begin by simplifying it.
The next examples demonstrate the use of this Problem-Solving Strategy. [link] illustrates the factor-and-cancel technique; [link] shows multiplying by a conjugate. In [link], we look at simplifying a complex fraction.
Evaluate
Step 1. The function
is undefined for
In fact, if we substitute 3 into the function we get
which is undefined. Factoring and canceling is a good strategy:
Step 2. For all
Therefore,
Step 3. Evaluate using the limit laws:
Evaluate
Step 1.
has the form
at −1. Let’s begin by multiplying by
the conjugate of
on the numerator and denominator:
Step 2. We then multiply out the numerator. We don’t multiply out the denominator because we are hoping that the
in the denominator cancels out in the end:
Step 3. Then we cancel:
Step 4. Last, we apply the limit laws:
Evaluate
Step 1.
has the form
at 1. We simplify the algebraic fraction by multiplying by
Step 2. Next, we multiply through the numerators. Do not multiply the denominators because we want to be able to cancel the factor
Step 3. Then, we simplify the numerator:
Step 4. Now we factor out −1 from the numerator:
Step 5. Then, we cancel the common factors of
Step 6. Last, we evaluate using the limit laws:
[link] does not fall neatly into any of the patterns established in the previous examples. However, with a little creativity, we can still use these same techniques.
Evaluate
Both
and
fail to have a limit at zero. Since neither of the two functions has a limit at zero, we cannot apply the sum law for limits; we must use a different strategy. In this case, we find the limit by performing addition and then applying one of our previous strategies. Observe that
Thus,
Evaluate
Let’s now revisit one-sided limits. Simple modifications in the limit laws allow us to apply them to one-sided limits. For example, to apply the limit laws to a limit of the form
we require the function
to be defined over an open interval of the form
for a limit of the form
we require the function
to be defined over an open interval of the form
[link] illustrates this point.
Evaluate each of the following limits, if possible.
[link] illustrates the function
and aids in our understanding of these limits.
is defined over the interval
Since this function is not defined to the left of 3, we cannot apply the limit laws to compute
In fact, since
is undefined to the left of 3,
does not exist.
is defined to the right of 3, the limit laws do apply to
By applying these limit laws we obtain
In [link] we look at one-sided limits of a piecewise-defined function and use these limits to draw a conclusion about a two-sided limit of the same function.
For
evaluate each of the following limits:
[link] illustrates the function
and aids in our understanding of these limits.
for all x in
replace
in the limit with
and apply the limit laws:
for all x in
replace
in the limit with
and apply the limit laws:
and
we conclude that
does not exist.
We now turn our attention to evaluating a limit of the form
where
where
and
That is,
has the form
at a.
Evaluate
Step 1. After substituting in
we see that this limit has the form
That is, as x approaches 2 from the left, the numerator approaches −1; and the denominator approaches 0. Consequently, the magnitude of
becomes infinite. To get a better idea of what the limit is, we need to factor the denominator:
Step 2. Since
is the only part of the denominator that is zero when 2 is substituted, we then separate
from the rest of the function:
Step 3.
and
Therefore, the product of
and
has a limit of
The techniques we have developed thus far work very well for algebraic functions, but we are still unable to evaluate limits of very basic trigonometric functions. The next theorem, called the squeeze theorem, proves very useful for establishing basic trigonometric limits. This theorem allows us to calculate limits by “squeezing” a function, with a limit at a point a that is unknown, between two functions having a common known limit at a. [link] illustrates this idea.
Let
and
be defined for all
over an open interval containing a. If
for all
in an open interval containing a and
where L is a real number, then
Apply the squeeze theorem to evaluate
Because
for all x, we have
. Since
from the squeeze theorem, we obtain
The graphs of
and
are shown in [link].
Use the squeeze theorem to evaluate
0
Use the fact that
to help you find two functions such that
is squeezed between them.
We now use the squeeze theorem to tackle several very important limits. Although this discussion is somewhat lengthy, these limits prove invaluable for the development of the material in both the next section and the next chapter. The first of these limits is
Consider the unit circle shown in [link]. In the figure, we see that
is the y-coordinate on the unit circle and it corresponds to the line segment shown in blue. The radian measure of angle θ is the length of the arc it subtends on the unit circle. Therefore, we see that for
Because
and
by using the squeeze theorem we conclude that
To see that
as well, observe that for
and hence,
Consequently,
It follows that
An application of the squeeze theorem produces the desired limit. Thus, since
and
Next, using the identity
for
we see that
We now take a look at a limit that plays an important role in later chapters—namely,
To evaluate this limit, we use the unit circle in [link]. Notice that this figure adds one additional triangle to [link]. We see that the length of the side opposite angle θ in this new triangle is
Thus, we see that for
By dividing by
in all parts of the inequality, we obtain
Equivalently, we have
Since
we conclude that
By applying a manipulation similar to that used in demonstrating that
we can show that
Thus,
In [link] we use this limit to establish
This limit also proves useful in later chapters.
Evaluate
In the first step, we multiply by the conjugate so that we can use a trigonometric identity to convert the cosine in the numerator to a sine:
Therefore,
Evaluate
0
Multiply numerator and denominator by
Some of the geometric formulas we take for granted today were first derived by methods that anticipate some of the methods of calculus. The Greek mathematician Archimedes (ca. 287−212; BCE) was particularly inventive, using polygons inscribed within circles to approximate the area of the circle as the number of sides of the polygon increased. He never came up with the idea of a limit, but we can use this idea to see what his geometric constructions could have predicted about the limit.
We can estimate the area of a circle by computing the area of an inscribed regular polygon. Think of the regular polygon as being made up of n triangles. By taking the limit as the vertex angle of these triangles goes to zero, you can obtain the area of the circle. To see this, carry out the following steps:
and r.
(Substitute
for
in your expression.)
The technique of estimating areas of regions by using polygons is revisited in Introduction to Integration.
In the following exercises, use the limit laws to evaluate each limit. Justify each step by indicating the appropriate limit law(s).
Use constant multiple law and difference law:
Use root law:
In the following exercises, use direct substitution to evaluate each limit.
49
1
In the following exercises, use direct substitution to show that each limit leads to the indeterminate form
Then, evaluate the limit.
then,
then,
then,
where a is a real-valued constant
then,
then,
In the following exercises, use direct substitution to obtain an undefined expression. Then, use the method of [link] to simplify the function to help determine the limit.
−∞
−∞
In the following exercises, assume that
and
Use these three facts and the limit laws to evaluate each limit.
[T] In the following exercises, use a calculator to draw the graph of each piecewise-defined function and study the graph to evaluate the given limits.
a. 9; b. 7
a. 1; b. 1
In the following exercises, use the following graphs and the limit laws to evaluate each limit.
For the following problems, evaluate the limit using the squeeze theorem. Use a calculator to graph the functions
and
when possible.
[T] True or False? If
then
[T]
The limit is zero.* * *
where
[T] In physics, the magnitude of an electric field generated by a point charge at a distance r in vacuum is governed by Coulomb’s law:
where E represents the magnitude of the electric field, q is the charge of the particle, r is the distance between the particle and where the strength of the field is measured, and
is Coulomb’s constant:
given that the charge of the particle is
What is the physical meaning of this quantity? Is it physically relevant? Why are you evaluating from the right?
a.* * *
b. ∞. The magnitude of the electric field as you approach the particle q becomes infinite. It does not make physical sense to evaluate negative distance.
[T] The density of an object is given by its mass divided by its volume:
assuming you are examining something of mass 8 kg (
and explain the physical meaning.
and
be defined for all
over some open interval containing a; assume that L and M are real numbers so that
and
let c be a constant
for every positive integer n
for
for all L if n is odd and for
if n is even
for all
over an open interval containing a and
where L is a real number, then
You can also download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/9a1df55a-b167-4736-b5ad-15d996704270@5.1
Attribution: